{"id":31033,"date":"2016-04-04T20:33:42","date_gmt":"2016-04-05T01:33:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/constitution\/article3\/annotation12.html"},"modified":"2024-08-21T20:18:08","modified_gmt":"2024-08-22T01:18:08","slug":"annotation12","status":"publish","type":"constitution","link":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/annotation12.html","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court Political Question Doctrine"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        <h1 class=\"fl-no-margin-top\">The Supreme Court Political Question Doctrine<\/h1>\n<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/madison-hess-j-d\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Madison Hess, J.D.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/edward-maggio-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Edward Maggio, Esq.<\/a>\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            August 21, 2024\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n    <div class=\"fl-callout-text article-blockquote\">\n        <p>The political question doctrine allows courts to avoid issues better handled by Congress or the president. It maintains the separation of powers by informing courts how to determine whether or not they should hear a case.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n    <\/div>\n\n<p>Every lawsuit begins with a plaintiff seeking justice. Sometimes, plaintiffs bring forth issues that may challenge the boundaries of judicial authority. Courts can&#8217;t hear all types of cases. The concept of justiciability concerns the type of case or controversy that a court can decide.<\/p>\r\n<p>A few of the factors a court must consider in determining if it can hear a case include:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/annotation10.html\">Standing<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/the-mootness-doctrine.html\">Mootness<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/the-ripeness-doctrine.html\">Ripeness<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The political question doctrine prevents courts from making decisions on political questions. Under the U.S. Constitution, such questions are meant for Congress or the president. There are non-judicial questions<b> <\/b>courts are not suited to answer. In some cases, the judiciary may lack objective standards to resolve the matter. A court ruling on an issue could disrupt the separation of powers.<\/p>\r\n<p>The political question doctrine prevents federal courts from making decisions they shouldn&#8217;t make. Decisions are better suited for Congress or the President to handle, such as how to run elections or handle foreign policy.<\/p>\r\n<p>The political question doctrine helps maintain the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article1\/annotation01.html\"><u>separation of powers<\/u><\/a>. Powers are separated between:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article1.html\">legislative branch<\/a> (the House of Representatives and the Senate)<\/li>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article2.html\">executive branch<\/a> (led by the President)<\/li>\r\n<li>And the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3.html\">judicial branch<\/a> (the Supreme Court and lower courts)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Preserving this separation is a matter of national security. The political question doctrine recognizes that there are some questions that judges aren\u2019t qualified to answer.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>How the Political Question Doctrine Works<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court must decide whether there are any cases they cannot decide under the political question doctrine. To identify a political question, the Court looks for factors originating in <a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/supreme-court-insights\/baker-v--carr--the-political-question-doctrine.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><u>Baker v. Carr<\/u><\/i><\/a> (1962.)<\/p>\r\n<p>The factors aim to protect the separation of powers and ensure the competency of courts. The Court uses the following factors to assess whether it can decide an issue:<\/p>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><p><b>There is a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to the issue<\/b>: Does the Constitution explicitly grant another branch of government (a coordinated political department) the power to answer this question?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><b>A lack of manageable standards<\/b>: Is there a reliable standard for resolving the issue?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><b>The impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination<\/b>: Would resolving the issue require a policy decision that is not judicial in nature?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><b>The impossibility of a court resolving the question without upsetting the separation of powers<\/b>: Would resolving the issue disrespect the roles and powers of the executive or legislative branches?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><b>An &quot;unusual need&quot; to adhere to a political decision already made: <\/b>Is there a need to adhere to a previous political decision?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><b>The &quot;potentiality of embarrassment&quot; from conflicting answers to one question<\/b>: Could there be conflicting statements by different branches of government on the issue?<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<h2><b>The Political Question Doctrine\u2019s Historical Origins and Constitutional Basis<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The political question doctrine is rooted in case law. Two pivotal Supreme Court decisions empowered the Court to invalidate laws conflicting with the Constitution and recognized the judiciary&#8217;s limitations due to coordinate branches of government.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Marbury v. Madison (1803) and Judicial Review<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/supreme-court-insights\/marbury-v--madison-case-summary--what-you-need-to-know.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><u>Marbury v. Madison<\/u><\/i><\/a> (1803)<b> <\/b>is the Supreme Court case that established the principle of <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/judicial-review.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><u>judicial review<\/u><\/a>. Judicial Review allows the courts to decide whether a law is constitutional.<\/p>\r\n<p>In 1803, William Marbury was appointed justice of the peace. Trouble followed when his commission wasn&#8217;t delivered, so Marbury asked the Supreme Court to force the delivery of his commission.<\/p>\r\n<p>A law allowed Marbury to bring his case directly to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote an opinion holding that the law was unconstitutional.<\/p>\r\n<p>This decision marked the first time the Supreme Court declared a law unconstitutional. It clarified the Court&#8217;s judicial power to interpret the Constitution and check the other branches of government.<\/p>\r\n<p><i>Marbury v. Madison<\/i> (1803) established the power of judicial review but also hinted at limits to this power. It suggested that some issues are exclusively for other government branches to decide. This laid the groundwork for the political question doctrine, the key principle of which is that federal courts should not decide issues better suited for other political branches.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Baker v. Carr (1962) Shapes Political Question Doctrine<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p><i>Baker v. Carr<\/i> (1962) shaped the doctrine by providing clear criteria for what constitutes a political question. The Supreme Court identified the six factors used to determine when courts should refrain from deciding cases.<\/p>\r\n<p>While <i>Marbury v. Madison<\/i> introduced the concept of judicial review, <i>Baker v. Carr<\/i> refined the political question doctrine. It clarified when the judiciary should defer to other branches.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>The Supreme Court and Partisan Gerrymandering<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>Partisan gerrymandering occurs when people draw voting district lines to help a political party win elections. This can compromise the fairness of elections because it may not accurately reflect the majority&#8217;s preferences. The Supreme Court usually doesn&#8217;t want to get involved because it sees it as a political problem, not just a legal one.<\/p>\r\n<p>The debate over the nonjusticiability of cases regarding partisan gerrymandering is ongoing. The following is a glance at arguments for and against the Court taking an active role in combating it.<\/p>\r\n<p>Arguments for the Supreme Court&#8217;s active role in eliminating partisan gerrymandering:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><b>Ensure fair representation:<\/b> The Court could help prevent the manipulation of electoral boundaries. This would promote fair elections.<\/li>\r\n<li><b>Protect democracy<\/b>: By addressing gerrymandering, the Court would safeguard democratic principles. It could ensure that electoral power is not unfairly concentrated.<\/li>\r\n<li><b>Enforce equal protection<\/b>: The Court could guard the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14.html\"><u>equal protection clause<\/u><\/a> against gerrymandering. This would promote equal treatment under the law.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Arguments against the Supreme Court&#8217;s active role in eliminating partisan gerrymandering:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><b>Not a judicial issue<\/b>: Some believe gerrymandering is a political issue not meant for the judiciary.<\/li>\r\n<li><b>No clear standards<\/b>: There is a concern about the absence of clear, manageable standards regarding gerrymandering, which could lead to inconsistent rulings.<\/li>\r\n<li><b>Encroaches on state sovereignty<\/b>: Some view the Court&#8217;s involvement as an encroachment on states&#8217; rights, contending that states are capable of administering their own electoral processes.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><b>Supreme Court Rulings on Gerrymandering<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court has tackled the complex issue of gerrymandering more than once. These cases show the Court is stepping back, saying these are political issues, not for judges to fix. This means that while gerrymandering might not seem fair, the Court won&#8217;t stop it, leaving it to politicians or new laws to make changes.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Vieth v. Jubelirer (2004)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/541\/267.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><u>Vieth v. Jubelirer<\/u><\/i><\/a><i> <\/i>(2004), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of partisan gerrymandering. The plurality opinion held that claims of partisan gerrymandering were nonjusticiable. It reasoned that there were no manageable standards for judging such cases.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court could not decide on a test for when political considerations in districting are unconstitutional. It deemed the matter a nonjusticiable political question. The decision meant the Supreme Court would not involve itself in questions of partisan gerrymandering. It left such issues to the political process.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Rucho v. Common Cause (2019)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/18-422.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><u>Rucho v. Common Cause<\/u><\/i><\/a> (2019), the Supreme Court ruled that partisan gerrymandering claims do not belong in federal court. It reasoned that they present a &quot;political question&quot; beyond the reach of federal judges. The Court found no clear legal standard to determine when the political influence on redistricting is excessive.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court acknowledged that partisan gerrymandering isn&#8217;t consistent with democratic principles. It concluded that it is not the federal judiciary&#8217;s role to solve this problem. The Court suggested that the issue could be addressed through state constitutions or by Congress. This ruling closed the door on federal courts challenging partisan gerrymandering. It left it up to the political branches of government and the states to find solutions.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Nixon v. United States (1993)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/506\/224.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><u>Nixon v. United States <\/u><\/i><\/a>(1993) examined impeachment trial issues. Walter Nixon, an impeached judge, argued the Senate didn&#8217;t follow proper trial procedures. However, the Court determined that it&#8217;s not their job to decide how the Senate conducts an impeachment. The concurring and dissenting opinions in this case delved into the nature of the impeachment trial process. They considered the judicial branch&#8217;s role in interpreting the Constitution&#8217;s impeachment language. The Court ruled that the Constitution gives the Senate the power to handle impeachment trials.<\/p>\r\n<p>The political question doctrine limits judicial review in cases involving state legislatures and congressional apportionment. This leaves redistricting and representation issues to the discretion of political branches.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s restraint in some matters respects the separation of powers and state sovereignty. It also leaves open questions about the protection of democratic principles. The future of the doctrine will shape the landscape of American politics. It is crucial to the fairness of electoral processes and the accountability of governmental actions.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n                        \n\n<div class=\"generalCardContainer\">\n            \n<div\n    class=\"fl-image-card fl-image-card--no-max-width fl-image-card--no-min-height fl-card-with-children fl-latl-card fl-image-card-title-on-image fl-flex fl-flex-column\"\n>\n                    <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\">\n\n            <div class=\"fl-image-card-image-wrapper fl-image-card-image-wrapper-default\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\n                     src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1750679574\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner.jpg?_i=AA\"\n                     alt=\"\"\n                ><\/img>\n                                    <span class=\"fl-eyebrow fl-image-card-eyebrow\">U.S. Constitution<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/a>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-image-card-content fl-flex-basis-100\">\n                    <h2>More On the Constitution<\/h2>\n<p>Learn about the most important legal document in the United States.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n\n            <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n<div class=\"email-subscription fl-mb30\">\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-header\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-content\">\n            <h3 class=\"fl-callout-sm fl-no-margin\">Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life<\/h3>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-image fl-flex fl-items-end\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\"\n                src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1737476907\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv.png?_i=AA\"\n                alt=\"\"\n                loading=\"lazy\"\n            \/>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-content fl-flex fl-flex-wrap\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-text fl-mb25\">\n            <h4 class=\"fl-no-margin\">Enter your email address to subscribe:<\/h4>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <form class=\"email-subscription-content-form\">\n            <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"distributionList\" value=\"lp\" \/>\n            <label for=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" class=\"fl-text-sm-bold\">Email (Required)<\/label>\n            <div class=\"email-subscription-content-form-group\">\n                <input id=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" name=\"email\" autocomplete=\"email\"\/>\n                <button type=\"submit\" aria-label=\"Submit\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-success subscribe-success-message fl-text-sm-bold\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"status\">Thank you for subscribing!<\/p>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-error subscribe-error-message fl-text-sm-bold\" role=\"alert\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/p>\n\n            <div id=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha\" class=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha subscribe-recaptcha\"\n                data-sitekey=\"0x4AAAAAAABGBEkK9kEeKxO-\"><\/div>\n        <\/form>\n\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-footer fl-text-sm\">\n            <p><a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.findlaw.com\" rel=\"noopener\">Learn more about FindLaw\u2019s newsletters<\/a>, including our terms of use and privacy policy.<\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"general-list\">\n    <h3>You May Also Like<\/h3>\n    <ul class=\"fl-list fl-no-margin\">\n                                    <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/annotation10.html\">\n                        Article III Standing Requirements\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/annotation13.html\">\n                        What Is the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine?\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/article3\/annotation14.html\">\n                        What Is Federal Question Jurisdiction?\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                        <\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"popularDirectory\">\n        <div class=\"general-popular-directory \">\n            <div class=\"general-popular-directory-title\">\n                <h3>Popular Directory Searches<\/h3>\n            <\/div>\n            <ul>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/constitutional-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitutional Law<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/civil-rights\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Rights<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/discrimination\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Discrimination<\/a><\/li>\n                            <\/ul>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":31026,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-31033","constitution","type-constitution","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/31033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/constitution"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/31026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}