{"id":30961,"date":"2016-04-04T20:34:02","date_gmt":"2016-04-05T01:34:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/constitution\/amendment14\/annotation10.html"},"modified":"2024-08-02T13:06:51","modified_gmt":"2024-08-02T18:06:51","slug":"annotation10","status":"publish","type":"constitution","link":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation10.html","title":{"rendered":"Affirmative Action Under the Fourteenth Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        <h1 class=\"fl-no-margin-top\">Affirmative Action Under the Fourteenth Amendment<\/h1>\n<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/laura-temme-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Laura Temme, Esq.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/edward-maggio-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Edward Maggio, Esq.<\/a>\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            August 02, 2024\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n    <div class=\"fl-callout-text article-blockquote\">\n        <p>&quot;Affirmative action&quot; refers to policies that promote diversity by offering opportunities to people from historically disadvantaged groups. For many years, many public colleges and universities used race as a factor in admissions decisions as part of affirmative action. The Supreme Court upheld this practice for decades until it overturned race-conscious admissions policies in 2023, saying they violated the Fourteenth Amendment.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n    <\/div>\n\n<p>The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect on July 9, 1868. Just a few years earlier, the Emancipation Proclamation had ended slavery, and the nation was going through major changes known as &quot;Reconstruction.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Three important constitutional amendments passed during this time:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment13.html\">Thirteenth Amendment<\/a> officially abolished slavery.<\/li>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14.html\">Fourteenth Amendment <\/a>granted citizenship to everyone born or naturalized in the United States and extended due process protections to actions by state governments. It also guarantees \u201cequal protection under the law.\u201d<\/li>\r\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment15.html\">Fifteenth Amendment<\/a> promised that no one would be denied the right to vote based on \u201crace, color, or previous condition of servitude.\u201d<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The Reconstruction Amendments made great strides toward equality for all people living in the United States. But, of course, there was more work to do.&nbsp;Ongoing efforts to correct the nation&#8217;s historical injustices present complex legal challenges. For example, how do programs that aim to help historically disadvantaged groups square with the Fourteenth Amendment?<\/p>\r\n<p>This article discusses the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and its relationship to affirmative action policies. Later sections summarize important Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action, including <i>Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College<\/i> (2023).<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>The Equal Protection Clause<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation04.html\">The equal protection clause<\/a> of the Fourteenth Amendment states:<\/p>\r\n<p>\u201c<i>No state shall<\/i>&#8230;<i>deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\r\n<p>Equal protection generally means that state laws must protect and preserve everyone\u2019s fundamental rights equally. It originally addressed racial discrimination against Black Americans. But the Supreme Court has identified other \u201csuspect classifications,\u201d including <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation06.html\">gender<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation09.html\">immigration status<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, the Supreme Court views different protected classes differently. Laws that discriminate <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation05.html\">based on race<\/a> or national origin must meet the highest standard of court review \u2014 strict scrutiny. This means the law must further a \u201ccompelling government interest\u201d and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The Court usually strikes down government actions evaluated under strict scrutiny.<\/p>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation06.html\">gender and sex discrimination cases<\/a>, the Court uses \u201cintermediate scrutiny.\u201d This means a law or policy must further an \u201cimportant\u201d government interest.<\/p>\r\n<p>Most other equal protection claims are evaluated using the \u201crational basis\u201d test. This is the easiest bar for the government to clear. If a government action is \u201crationally related\u201d to a \u201clegitimate\u201d government interest, the Court will generally allow it to stand.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court has also extended the equal protection clause to actions by the federal government via the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment5.html\">Fifth Amendment<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>What Is Affirmative Action?<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>Affirmative action is the practice of giving preferential treatment to members of historically disadvantaged groups. A common example is an institution of higher education that considers an applicant\u2019s race when making admissions decisions.<\/p>\r\n<p>For many years, public colleges and universities made concerted efforts to bring in applicants from varied backgrounds. Groups that historically were kept out of higher education, such as women and people of color, were given priority.<\/p>\r\n<p>Affirmative action policies are also common in the employment space. Many companies consider racial diversity as an important factor in hiring.<\/p>\r\n<p>The concept of affirmative action dates back to&nbsp;the 1940s, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued <a href=\"https:\/\/www.archives.gov\/milestone-documents\/executive-order-8802\" rel=\"noopener\">Executive Order 8802<\/a>. The order required defense contractors &quot;to provide for the full and equitable participation of all workers in defense industries, without discrimination&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>But the phrase \u201caffirmative action\u201d first appeared in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dol.gov\/agencies\/ofccp\/about\/executive-order-11246-history#:~:text=and%20vice%20chair.-,Executive%20Order%2010925,-By%20the%20time\" rel=\"noopener\">an executive order issued by President John F. Kennedy in 1961<\/a>. This order required government contractors to \u201ctake affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/civilrights\/discrimination\/title-vi-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964-non-discrimination-in.html\" rel=\"noopener\">The Civil Rights Act of 1964<\/a> provided additional civil rights protection. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in \u201cany program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/civilrights\/discrimination\/race-discrimination-in-education.html\" rel=\"noopener\">Virtually all public education settings<\/a> fall under this category.<\/p>\r\n<p>President Lyndon B. Johnson, who signed the Act into law, saw affirmative action as a way to address the historical injustices faced by African Americans and other marginalized groups.<\/p>\r\n<p>In the years that followed, affirmative action became increasingly controversial. Critics argued that giving preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity was unfair. Supporters countered that affirmative action was necessary to redress past discrimination and segregation and to promote diversity in the workplace and higher education.<\/p>\r\n<h2>Affirmative Action Challenges<\/h2>\r\n<p>Some argue that because the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees &quot;equal protection under the law,&quot; no government program can give one person or group an advantage over others.<\/p>\r\n<p>Others point to the underlying goal of the Fourteenth Amendment \u2014 eliminating oppression \u2014 as a justification for affirmative action programs. The Supreme Court upheld this idea in several cases, including&nbsp;<i>Adarand Constructors v. Pena&nbsp;<\/i>and&nbsp;<i>Grutter v. Bollinger<\/i>.<\/p>\r\n<p>In<i>&nbsp;Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin<\/i>, the Supreme Court held that racial and ethnic preferences in college and university admissions policies must meet the &quot;strict scrutiny&quot; standard. This means the policies must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest. Usually, the &quot;interest&quot; in these cases is diversity.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, on June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two pivotal cases related to affirmative action. In <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President &amp; Fellows of Harvard College, <\/i>the court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/legalblogs\/supreme-court\/scotus-undoes-two-decades-of-affirmative-action\/\" rel=\"noopener\">overturned decades of precedent<\/a> and ruled that race-based admissions decisions are no longer appropriate in higher education settings.<\/p>\r\n<p>The opinion also addressed a similar case, <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina. <\/i>In short, the 6-2 majority held that achieving educational diversity is too vague to qualify as a compelling government interest. Therefore, the Court found that using race as a factor in college admissions decisions is unconstitutional.<\/p>\r\n<p>We discuss the <i>Harvard <\/i>decision and other important affirmative action cases below.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>Supreme Court Decisions on Affirmative Action<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>Over the course of nearly 50 years, the Supreme Court refined its approach to equal protection challenges brought against affirmative action policies. Below, we outline the Court&#8217;s analysis in each of these cases.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>University of California Regents v. Bakke<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court first addressed affirmative action in the 1978 case&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/438\/265.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke<\/i><\/a>. Allan Bakke, a white applicant to the University of California Davis Medical School, claimed that he had been unfairly denied enrollment in favor of less qualified minority candidates.<\/p>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the school&#8217;s use of racial quotas. However, it upheld the consideration of race in college admissions decisions to achieve a diverse student body.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, the opinion also affirmed the California Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to order Bakke&#8217;s admission to the school.<\/p>\r\n<p>The divisiveness of this case is evident from the six separate opinions it spawned. Justices Brennan, White, Marshall, and Blackmun, who concurred in part and dissented in part, stated that the school&#8217;s special admissions program was not unconstitutional.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Fullilove v. Klutznick<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court again&nbsp;addressed affirmative action&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/448\/448.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Fullilove v. Klutznick<\/i><\/a>. This case involved a challenge to a provision of the Public Works Employment Act of 1977. The law required that 10% of federal funding for certain public works projects be set aside for businesses owned by &quot;minority group members.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>The plaintiffs argued that the provision violated the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment5\/annotation05.html\">Fifth Amendment&#8217;s due process clause<\/a> as well as the<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment5\/annotation05.html\"> <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation04.html\">equal protection clause<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p>In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Burger, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the provision&#8217;s constitutionality. The majority held that the government had a compelling interest in remedying past discrimination against minority groups. And the provision was a permissible way to pursue that interest.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Decided in 1982,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/458\/718.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan<\/i><\/a>&nbsp;questioned whether a publicly funded women&#8217;s college could exclude men from its nursing school admissions. The Supreme Court held that excluding men from undergraduate admissions violated the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation04.html\">14th Amendment<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>The school argued that its goal was to provide a &quot;unique educational experience&quot; for women. And that excluding men was necessary to remedy past discrimination against women.<\/p>\r\n<p>Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor, the first female Supreme Court Justice, authored the majority opinion. The majority reasoned that excluding men from the nursing program at Mississippi University for Women was not &quot;substantially related&quot; to achieving its goals.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court rejected the argument that the policy was necessary to remedy past discrimination against women. Instead, the court found the policy actually perpetuated the stereotype that nursing was a &quot;woman&#8217;s job.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>This case is heavily cited in cases involving affirmative action policies. It established that any use of race or sex as a criterion for admission or hiring must be narrowly tailored and serve a compelling governmental interest.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Affirmative action was addressed again in the landmark case&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/476\/267.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education <\/i><\/a>(1986). This case challenged a policy requiring layoffs of teachers to be made&nbsp;based on&nbsp;seniority, except where doing so would result in a disproportionate impact on minority teachers. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the policy violated the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation04.html\">14th Amendment&#8217;s equal protection clause<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>In the majority opinion, Justice Brennan wrote that the policy was unconstitutional because it employed a racial classification that did not serve a compelling governmental interest. The Supreme Court rejected the argument that the policy was necessary to remedy past discrimination.<\/p>\r\n<p>This case established that racial classifications must be closely scrutinized to ensure that they are necessary to remedy past discrimination and are narrowly tailored to achieve that goal.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>United States v. Paradise<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In 1987,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/480\/149.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>United States v. Paradise<\/i><\/a>&nbsp;challenged a court-ordered affirmative action plan for the hiring and promotion of Black police officers in Birmingham, Alabama. The District Court found that for almost four decades, the Alabama Department of Public Safety had systematically excluded African Americans from employment as state troopers in violation of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14.html\">Fourteenth Amendment<\/a>. As a result, the court issued an order imposing a hiring quota.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court held that the plan was constitutional because it was narrowly tailored to remedy the effects of past discrimination against Black police officers. The plan was a permissible form of affirmative action because it was temporary and limited in scope.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/515\/200.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena<\/i><\/a>&nbsp;was a significant 1995 decision involving a challenge to a federal program that gave contractors a financial incentive to hire minority-owned subcontractors.&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court held that the program was subject to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/strict-scrutiny.html\" rel=\"noopener\">strict scrutiny<\/a>&nbsp;and remanded the case to the lower court to determine whether the program was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest.<\/p>\r\n<p>In the majority opinion, Justice O&#8217;Connor wrote that all racial classifications by the government must be subject to strict scrutiny, which requires that the government show:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>A compelling interest in the classification, and<\/li>\r\n<li>That the classification is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court noted that the programs that employ race-based criteria must be evaluated carefully to ensure that they do not discriminate against non-minority individuals, that are necessary to remedy past discrimination.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Grutter v. Bollinger<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court addressed affirmative action again in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/539\/306.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Grutter v. Bollinger <\/i>(2003)<\/a>. In this case, the Court upheld the use of race as a factor in admissions decisions at the University of Michigan Law School. Again on the grounds of promoting diversity.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, the U.S. Supreme Court also made clear that affirmative action programs must be narrowly tailored and cannot use quotas or set aside a certain number of seats.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court also indicated that it might not uphold affirmative action policies forever. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/legalblogs\/federal-courts\/sandra-day-oconnor-dies-independent-pragmatic-and-overturned\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Justice Sandra Day O\u2019Connor<\/a> wrote for the majority:<\/p>\r\n<p>&quot;[R]ace-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time &#8230; The Court expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/11-345.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin <\/i>(2013), <\/a>Abigail Fisher, a white applicant to the University of Texas, challenged the school&#8217;s use of race as a factor in admissions decisions.<\/p>\r\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court held that the school&#8217;s program was unconstitutional but emphasized that affirmative action programs must be subject to strict scrutiny and continually evaluated for their effectiveness.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p><i>Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College<\/i>&nbsp;alleged that Harvard College discriminated against Asian applicants in its school admissions process. The lawsuit was filed in 2014 by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a nonprofit membership organization that opposes affirmative action policies in undergraduate admissions.<\/p>\r\n<p>SFFA alleged that Harvard intentionally discriminated against Asian applicants by holding them to a higher standard than other minority student applicants. Harvard denied the allegations. Harvard argued that it does not discriminate against any particular racial or ethnic group and seeks to create a diverse student body.<\/p>\r\n<p>SFFA also accused the University of North Carolina (UNC) of using racial discrimination in their admissions processes. The lawsuit argued that affirmative action policies gave an unfair advantage to Black and Hispanic applicants over white and Asian applicants.<\/p>\r\n<p>Both schools used a screening system that scored applicants in different categories, such as:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Academic<\/li>\r\n<li>Extracurricular<\/li>\r\n<li>Athletic<\/li>\r\n<li>School support<\/li>\r\n<li>Personal<\/li>\r\n<li>Overall<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>At Harvard, race was not considered as part of the \u201cpersonal\u201d category. However, admissions officers could consider an applicant\u2019s race when evaluating the \u201coverall\u201d category.<\/p>\r\n<p>A federal judge ruled in Harvard&#8217;s favor in 2019, finding that the school&#8217;s admissions process was constitutional and did not discriminate against Asian-American applicants. SFFA appealed the decision in November 2020, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-1st-circuit\/2096039.html\" rel=\"noopener\">the First Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;upheld the lower court&#8217;s ruling<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court took up both cases in its 2022-2023 term.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/20-1199.html\" rel=\"noopener\">In a 6-2 decision<\/a> written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court held that using race as a factor in college admissions violates the equal protection clause.<\/p>\r\n<p>The majority acknowledged that the equal protection clause protects students from discrimination based on race. But it also prohibits people from being \u201crewarded\u201d because of their race. In their view, each student \u201cmust be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual \u2014 not on the basis of race.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Justice Jackson recused herself from the Harvard decision because she is a former member of Harvard\u2019s board of overseers. However, she filed a separate dissent in the UNC case.<\/p>\r\n<p>The dissenting justices argued that the majority gave no real reasoning for going against the principle of <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/stare-decisis.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>stare decisis<\/i><\/a> and overturning 45 years of precedent. Moreover, they argued, the country has not yet reached a state of equality to make affirmative action unnecessary.<\/p>\r\n<p>The decision has already upended college admissions processes around the country. However, its impact on diversity in higher education likely won\u2019t be clear for several years.<\/p>\r\n<p>Some schools, such as the University of Texas at Austin, automatically admit the top graduates from each high school in the state. These policies can help increase a school&#8217;s racial and socioeconomic diversity without affirmative action. However, a 2020 study of schools that banned affirmative action before the <i>Harvard <\/i>decision found that alternative policies <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/stoken\/default+domain\/UH4YSS3QHRCBY2VJEKPT\/full\" rel=\"noopener\">were not able to fully replace <\/a>race-conscious admissions policies.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n                        \n\n<div class=\"generalCardContainer\">\n            \n<div\n    class=\"fl-image-card fl-image-card--no-max-width fl-image-card--no-min-height fl-card-with-children fl-latl-card fl-image-card-title-on-image fl-flex fl-flex-column\"\n>\n                    <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\">\n\n            <div class=\"fl-image-card-image-wrapper fl-image-card-image-wrapper-default\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\n                     src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1750679574\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner.jpg?_i=AA\"\n                     alt=\"\"\n                ><\/img>\n                                    <span class=\"fl-eyebrow fl-image-card-eyebrow\">U.S. Constitution<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/a>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-image-card-content fl-flex-basis-100\">\n                    <h2>More On the Constitution<\/h2>\n<p>Learn about the most important legal document in the United States.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n\n            <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n<div class=\"email-subscription fl-mb30\">\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-header\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-content\">\n            <h3 class=\"fl-callout-sm fl-no-margin\">Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life<\/h3>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-image fl-flex fl-items-end\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\"\n                src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1737476907\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv.png?_i=AA\"\n                alt=\"\"\n                loading=\"lazy\"\n            \/>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-content fl-flex fl-flex-wrap\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-text fl-mb25\">\n            <h4 class=\"fl-no-margin\">Enter your email address to subscribe:<\/h4>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <form class=\"email-subscription-content-form\">\n            <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"distributionList\" value=\"lp\" \/>\n            <label for=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" class=\"fl-text-sm-bold\">Email (Required)<\/label>\n            <div class=\"email-subscription-content-form-group\">\n                <input id=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" name=\"email\" autocomplete=\"email\"\/>\n                <button type=\"submit\" aria-label=\"Submit\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-success subscribe-success-message fl-text-sm-bold\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"status\">Thank you for subscribing!<\/p>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-error subscribe-error-message fl-text-sm-bold\" role=\"alert\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/p>\n\n            <div id=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha\" class=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha subscribe-recaptcha\"\n                data-sitekey=\"0x4AAAAAAABGBEkK9kEeKxO-\"><\/div>\n        <\/form>\n\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-footer fl-text-sm\">\n            <p><a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.findlaw.com\" rel=\"noopener\">Learn more about FindLaw\u2019s newsletters<\/a>, including our terms of use and privacy policy.<\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"general-list\">\n    <h3>You May Also Like<\/h3>\n    <ul class=\"fl-list fl-no-margin\">\n                                    <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/education\/higher-education\/affirmative-action-and-college-admissions.html\" rel=\"noopener\">\n                        Affirmative Action and College Admissions\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/education\/discrimination-harassment-at-school\/race-discrimination-in-education-law-and-history.html\" rel=\"noopener\">\n                        Race Discrimination in Education: Law and History\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/education\/discrimination-harassment-at-school\/sex-discrimination-in-education-exemptions-under-title-ix.html\" rel=\"noopener\">\n                        Sex Discrimination in Education Exemptions Under Title IX\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                        <\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"popularDirectory\">\n        <div class=\"general-popular-directory \">\n            <div class=\"general-popular-directory-title\">\n                <h3>Popular Directory Searches<\/h3>\n            <\/div>\n            <ul>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/constitutional-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitutional Law<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/civil-rights\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Rights<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/discrimination\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Discrimination<\/a><\/li>\n                            <\/ul>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":30951,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-30961","constitution","type-constitution","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/constitution"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}