{"id":30903,"date":"2016-04-04T20:33:52","date_gmt":"2016-04-05T01:33:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/constitution\/amendment4\/annotation03.html"},"modified":"2024-08-12T19:42:12","modified_gmt":"2024-08-13T00:42:12","slug":"annotation03","status":"publish","type":"constitution","link":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation03.html","title":{"rendered":"Fourth Amendment Seizure of Persons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        <h1 class=\"fl-no-margin-top\">Fourth Amendment Seizure of Persons<\/h1>\n<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/linda-sanabria-j-d\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Linda Sanabria, J.D.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/edward-maggio-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Edward Maggio, Esq.<\/a>\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            August 12, 2024\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n    <div class=\"fl-callout-text article-blockquote\">\n        <p>Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, law enforcement cannot perform \u201cunreasonable searches and seizures.\u201d This includes the seizure of one\u2019s person, such as an arrest.<\/p>\n\n    <\/div>\n\n<p>The Fourth Amendment forbids the arrest or detention of a person without a warrant or probable cause. However, the Supreme Court has spent many decades determining what it means to be \u201cdetained\u201d and when such action is unreasonable.<br>\r\n<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>What the Fourth Amendment Says<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The Fourth Amendment states:<\/p>\r\n<p><i>\u201cThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\r\n<p>For most people, the Fourth Amendment\u2019s text brings to mind the illegal search and<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation02.html\"> seizure of a person\u2019s property<\/a>. However, the Fourth Amendment also applies to the person themselves. In this context, an &quot;unreasonable seizure&quot; is any government action that illegally restrains freedom of movement.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Fourth Amendment demands that any seizure be reasonable. It typically <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation05.html\">requires a warrant<\/a> supported by <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation04.html\">probable cause<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>Probable cause limits law enforcement&#8217;s power to arrest or detain individuals. Officers must have a reasonable basis to believe that a person has committed a crime before they can lawfully detain them. The Supreme Court has provided clarification on the application of probable cause through various rulings.<\/p>\r\n<p>Evidence of a crime is crucial in establishing probable cause, which is necessary for a seizure to be lawful under the Fourth Amendment. Law enforcement officers must have a reasonable belief, supported by evidence, to believe that a person has committed a crime to justify an arrest or detention. Without sufficient evidence, any seizure could be deemed unreasonable and unconstitutional.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, the Fourth Amendment only applies to unlawful searches and seizures by the government. Indeed, if a private investigator, curious neighbor, or doubtful partner searches for your property, the Fourth Amendment does not govern their actions.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Is a Warrantless Arrest an Unreasonable Seizure?<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>It can be. The Fourth Amendment\u2019s protection against unreasonable seizures applies to persons and property. The courts have viewed unlawful arrests as unreasonable seizures. However, the key thing to remember is that law enforcement can arrest without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe a crime is being committed.&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court has long interpreted the Fourth Amendment\u2019s phrase \u201cthe right of the people to be secure in their persons\u201d as a protection against arbitrary arrests. So, an arrest without a warrant or probable cause is seen as an \u201cunreasonable seizure\u201d of one\u2019s person under the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, there are <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation06.html\">exceptions to the warrant requirement,<\/a> such as:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Exigent circumstances<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Searches with consent<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Searches incident to a lawful arrest<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>These exceptions allow for warrantless searches and seizures when obtaining a warrant is impractical or unnecessary.<\/p>\r\n<p>Below, we discuss essential Supreme Court cases on the seizure of persons. These decisions helped define and refine what an arrest or detention means to be unreasonable.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>Supreme Court Cases on Seizures and Arrests<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The following Supreme Court decisions significantly impacted criminal law. In each, the Court had to determine the scope and limits of the Fourth Amendment\u2019s protection against unreasonable seizures.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Terry v. Ohio (1968)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/392\/1.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Terry v. Ohio<\/i><\/a>, a plainclothes officer observed John W. Terry and two other men acting suspiciously. The men were taking turns walking back and forth along an identical route, pausing to look into a store window repeatedly.<\/p>\r\n<p>The officer suspected that they were planning a robbery. He approached the men, identified himself as a police officer, and patted down the exterior of their clothing. He discovered weapons on Terry and one of the other men, Chilton. Both were charged with carrying concealed weapons.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court considered whether the Fourth Amendment applies to police stop-and-frisk actions when there is no probable cause for arrest. The Court ruled that it does.<\/p>\r\n<p>However, if an officer observes unusual conduct that leads them to suspect criminal activity reasonably and that the persons involved may be armed and presently dangerous, they may conduct a limited search (a &quot;pat-down&quot; or &quot;frisk&quot;) for weapons without violating the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court introduced a balancing test to evaluate the reasonableness of the warrantless search. It weighed the need for the search against the invasion of privacy it entails. The Court acknowledged the officer&#8217;s need to protect himself and others nearby by ensuring the suspect was not armed. The intrusion on the suspect by a pat-down search for weapons is minor compared to the interest in officer safety.<\/p>\r\n<p>The ruling in <i>Terry v. Ohio<\/i> established that police officers can stop and frisk suspects on the street without a warrant. But only if they reasonably suspect that the person may be involved in criminal activity and may be armed and dangerous.<\/p>\r\n<p>This is a lower standard than probable cause, which is required for an arrest.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>California v. Hodari D. (1991)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Late one evening, two police officers in an unmarked car approached a group of youths, including Hodari D., who fled upon seeing the officers. Officer Pertoso chased Hodari on foot. During the chase, Hodari threw away what appeared to be a small rock, which was later identified as crack cocaine. Hodari was tackled by Pertoso shortly thereafter and taken into custody.<\/p>\r\n<p>Hodari sought to suppress the evidence of the discarded cocaine. He argued that it was obtained through an unlawful seizure, as he was seized without reasonable suspicion when he dropped the cocaine.<\/p>\r\n<p>Was Hodari D. &quot;seized&quot; within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment at the time he discarded the cocaine? Indeed, evidence would be considered inadmissible if it were acquired as a result of an unlawful seizure.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/499\/621.html\" rel=\"noopener\">The U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> decided that Hodari D. was not &quot;seized&quot; within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment at the time he discarded the cocaine. Therefore, the evidence was admissible and not obtained through an unlawful seizure.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court held that a seizure does not occur until a suspect:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Is physically apprehended, or<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Submits to a show of authority by law enforcement<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The Court clarified that mere pursuit by police does not constitute a seizure. For a seizure to occur, there must be either physical force or a submission to an assertion of authority. Since Hodari did not submit and was not physically restrained until after he discarded the cocaine, no seizure had taken place at the critical moment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The ruling has significant implications for the admissibility of evidence discarded in the course of police pursuits. It highlights the critical nature of the exact moment at which a seizure is deemed to have occurred in assessing the legality of police conduct.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Mapp v. Ohio (1961)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In this case, police received a tip that a suspect in a bombing case might be hiding in Dollree Mapp&#8217;s house. The tip also stated that the house might have illegal betting equipment. When Mapp refused to let them in without a warrant, the officers forced entry into her home. They presented a paper they claimed was a search warrant, which was never produced at trial. During their search, the police found obscene materials. This led to Mapp&#8217;s conviction under Ohio law.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/367\/643.html\" rel=\"noopener\">The Supreme Court<\/a> held that the exclusionary rule, which prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in federal court, also applies to state courts through the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation03.html\">Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s due process clause<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court reasoned that the right to privacy, free from unreasonable searches and seizures, would be meaningless without the exclusionary rule to deter police misconduct and protect citizens&#8217; constitutional rights.<\/p>\r\n<p>By applying the exclusionary rule to the states, the Court ensured that evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures would be inadmissible in state courts, just as in federal courts. Evidence obtained in an illegal search is often called the \u201cfruit of the poisonous tree.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Maryland v. King (2013)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Alonzo King Jr. was arrested in Maryland on assault charges in a criminal case. A DNA sample was collected from King using a cheek swab as part of the standard booking procedure for serious offenses.<\/p>\r\n<p>The DNA sample matched evidence from an unsolved rape case. This led to King being charged and convicted for that crime. King challenged the DNA collection, arguing that it violated his Fourth Amendment rights.<\/p>\r\n<p>The question before the Supreme Court was: Does the collection and analysis of a DNA sample from an arrestee, without a warrant and without individualized suspicion, violate the Fourth Amendment?<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court affirmed that the routine <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/12-207.html\" rel=\"noopener\">collection and analysis of DNA from arrestees for serious offenses is a reasonable search<\/a> under the Fourth Amendment. It does not violate the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court held that the state&#8217;s interest in identifying arrestees and solving crimes outweighs the arrestee&#8217;s limited expectation of privacy. The Court likened DNA collection to fingerprinting and photographing, other standard identification practices. The Court emphasized that DNA collection serves legitimate governmental interests, including:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Accurately identifying arrestees<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Solving past and future crimes<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Exonerating innocent suspects<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The Court also noted that the intrusion of a cheek swab is minimal and reasonable in light of the significant benefits to public safety. Consequently, the procedure was deemed a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>This decision has led to broader use of DNA databases and has significantly impacted the criminal justice system. It allows law enforcement to connect arrestees to unsolved crimes while protecting public safety.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>United States v. Drayton (2002)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>During a routine drug and weapons interdiction effort, three police officers boarded a bus. The officers were dressed in plain clothes but wore visible badges and weapons. They began questioning passengers. However, they did not inform them of their right to refuse cooperation or leave. Officers approached Christopher Drayton and Clifton Brown, who were seated together. The officers asked for their consent to search their luggage and persons. Both men consented.<\/p>\r\n<p>Drayton, who was found in possession of drugs, was arrested and later sought to suppress the evidence. He contended that the search and seizure were unconstitutional as he had not been informed of his right to refuse consent.<\/p>\r\n<p>The issue here was whether police officers must inform bus passengers of their right not to cooperate and to refuse consent to searches. The Supreme Court held that <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/536\/194.html\" rel=\"noopener\">police officers are not required to inform bus passengers<\/a> of their right to refuse cooperation during consensual encounters.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court reasoned that the voluntariness of consent to search is determined by the totality of the circumstances. In this case, the Court found no evidence of coercion or intimidation. The presence of officers and their conduct, including their tone and demeanor, were not deemed coercive. The Court emphasized that the test for voluntariness is whether a reasonable person would:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Feel free to decline the officers&#8217; requests, or<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Terminate the encounter<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>In Drayton\u2019s case, the Court concluded that a reasonable person would have felt free to refuse the officers&#8217; requests.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Florida v. Bostick (1991)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Terrance Bostick was a passenger on a Greyhound bus traveling from Miami to Atlanta. During a stop in Fort Lauderdale, two uniformed and armed police officers boarded the bus as part of a routine drug interdiction effort. They approached Bostick and asked for his identification and ticket.<\/p>\r\n<p>They asked for his consent to search his luggage without informing him of his right to refuse. Bostick gave his consent, and subsequently, the officers discovered cocaine in his luggage. Arrested on charges of drug trafficking, Bostick attempted to suppress the evidence. He argued that the encounter was a seizure under the Fourth Amendment, asserting that he did not feel free to leave or refuse the search.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court held that a seizure does not occur <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/501\/429.html\" rel=\"noopener\">if a reasonable person feels free to decline the officer&#8217;s requests or <\/a>terminate the encounter.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court emphasized that the proper inquiry is whether, considering all the circumstances surrounding the encounter, a reasonable passenger would feel free to decline the officers&#8217; requests or leave the scene. The Court rejected the Florida Supreme Court&#8217;s per se rule that such encounters on buses are inherently coercive.<\/p>\r\n<p>Instead, the Court held that each case must be analyzed based on its own facts. The Court remanded the case to the Florida courts to determine whether Bostick&#8217;s consent to the search was voluntary under the totality of the circumstances.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Brendlin v. California (2007)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Bruce Brendlin, a passenger in a vehicle operated by Karen Simeroth, was subject to a police stop for a traffic infraction. During the stop, officers identified Brendlin and found he had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. Following his arrest, authorities discovered drug paraphernalia on him and within the vehicle. Brendlin sought to suppress this evidence, contending that the traffic stop was illegal and that his seizure as a passenger breached the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The issue here was whether a passenger in a car stopped by police is seized for Fourth Amendment purposes and thus can challenge the constitutionality of the stop. The Supreme Court ruled that passengers are seized during a traffic stop and thus have the standing to challenge the constitutionality of the stop.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court reasoned that <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/551\/249.html\" rel=\"noopener\">a reasonable passenger<\/a> in a car would not feel free to terminate their encounter with the police and leave the scene during a traffic stop. Therefore, passengers are considered seized under the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court has determined that the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures apply to all occupants within a vehicle, not solely the driver. The decision emphasizes that the legality of the stop affects everyone in the vehicle. Therefore, passengers have the standing to challenge the stop&#8217;s constitutionality.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Michigan v. Chesternut (1988)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Police officers were patrolling in a marked car when they observed respondent Chesternut run away upon seeing the police car. The officers followed Chesternut in their car, observing his actions. During the pursuit, Chesternut discarded several packets. The officers recovered the items and determined they were contraband. Chestnut was taken into custody and faced charges of possessing controlled substances. He sought to suppress the evidence, contending that his seizure lacked reasonable suspicion and was unconstitutional.<\/p>\r\n<p>The issue was whether police pursuit constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court determined that <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/486\/567.html\" rel=\"noopener\">police pursuit<\/a> alone is not necessarily a seizure. A seizure requires physical force or submission to authority.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court determined that interactions between law enforcement officers and citizens do not always constitute a seizure. In the instance of Chesternut, the Court concluded that the police&#8217;s actions did not equate to a seizure. The police did not use physical force or display authority in a way that would have caused a reasonable person to believe they were not free to do their business. Therefore, Chesternut was not seized when he discarded the packets, and the evidence was admissible.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Katz v. United States (1967)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In this case, Charles Katz was suspected of illegal gambling activities. FBI agents placed an electronic listening device outside a public phone booth that Katz used to transmit information. The FBI recorded Katz&#8217;s conversations without a warrant, leading to his conviction. Katz challenged the conviction. He argued that the recordings violated his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court had to decide whether electronic eavesdropping in a public place constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. A search occurs when a person\u2019s reasonable expectation of privacy is violated.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court held that <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/389\/347.html\" rel=\"noopener\">the Fourth Amendment protects individuals&#8217; privacy, regardless of the location<\/a>. It introduced the two-prong test to determine whether a Fourth Amendment violation has occurred:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Whether the individual has exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy, and<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Whether the expectation is one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Katz had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone booth. The FBI&#8217;s electronic surveillance without a warrant violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Court rejected the notion that the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s applicability was limited to physical intrusions.<\/p>\r\n<p>This case established the foundation for privacy rights in the context of modern technology and continues to influence rulings on surveillance and privacy issues.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n                        \n\n<div class=\"generalCardContainer\">\n            \n<div\n    class=\"fl-image-card fl-image-card--no-max-width fl-image-card--no-min-height fl-card-with-children fl-latl-card fl-image-card-title-on-image fl-flex fl-flex-column\"\n>\n                    <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\">\n\n            <div class=\"fl-image-card-image-wrapper fl-image-card-image-wrapper-default\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\n                     src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1750679574\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner.jpg?_i=AA\"\n                     alt=\"\"\n                ><\/img>\n                                    <span class=\"fl-eyebrow fl-image-card-eyebrow\">U.S. Constitution<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/a>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-image-card-content fl-flex-basis-100\">\n                    <h2>More On the Constitution<\/h2>\n<p>Learn about the most important legal document in the United States.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n\n            <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n<div class=\"email-subscription fl-mb30\">\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-header\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-content\">\n            <h3 class=\"fl-callout-sm fl-no-margin\">Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life<\/h3>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-image fl-flex fl-items-end\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\"\n                src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1737476907\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv.png?_i=AA\"\n                alt=\"\"\n                loading=\"lazy\"\n            \/>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-content fl-flex fl-flex-wrap\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-text fl-mb25\">\n            <h4 class=\"fl-no-margin\">Enter your email address to subscribe:<\/h4>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <form class=\"email-subscription-content-form\">\n            <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"distributionList\" value=\"lp\" \/>\n            <label for=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" class=\"fl-text-sm-bold\">Email (Required)<\/label>\n            <div class=\"email-subscription-content-form-group\">\n                <input id=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" name=\"email\" autocomplete=\"email\"\/>\n                <button type=\"submit\" aria-label=\"Submit\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-success subscribe-success-message fl-text-sm-bold\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"status\">Thank you for subscribing!<\/p>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-error subscribe-error-message fl-text-sm-bold\" role=\"alert\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/p>\n\n            <div id=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha\" class=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha subscribe-recaptcha\"\n                data-sitekey=\"0x4AAAAAAABGBEkK9kEeKxO-\"><\/div>\n        <\/form>\n\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-footer fl-text-sm\">\n            <p><a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.findlaw.com\" rel=\"noopener\">Learn more about FindLaw\u2019s newsletters<\/a>, including our terms of use and privacy policy.<\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"general-list\">\n    <h3>You May Also Like<\/h3>\n    <ul class=\"fl-list fl-no-margin\">\n                                    <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/bill-of-rights.html\">\n                        The Bill of Rights\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation02.html\">\n                        Fourth Amendment Seizure of Property\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment4\/annotation06.html\">\n                        Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment Warrant Requirement\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                        <\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"popularDirectory\">\n        <div class=\"general-popular-directory \">\n            <div class=\"general-popular-directory-title\">\n                <h3>Popular Directory Searches<\/h3>\n            <\/div>\n            <ul>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/criminal-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Defense<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/constitutional-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitutional Law<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/civil-rights\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Rights<\/a><\/li>\n                            <\/ul>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":30900,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-30903","constitution","type-constitution","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/constitution"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30900"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}