{"id":30884,"date":"2021-06-29T11:06:12","date_gmt":"2021-06-29T16:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/constitution\/amendment1\/first-amendment-limits--obscenity.html"},"modified":"2024-08-07T15:12:09","modified_gmt":"2024-08-07T20:12:09","slug":"first-amendment-limits-obscenity","status":"publish","type":"constitution","link":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-limits-obscenity.html","title":{"rendered":"First Amendment Limits: Obscenity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n<div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\"><h1 class=\"fl-no-margin-top\">First Amendment Limits: Obscenity<\/h1>\n\n<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/balrina-ahluwalia-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Balrina Ahluwalia, Esq.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/edward-maggio-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Edward Maggio, Esq.<\/a>\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            August 07, 2024\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n    <div class=\"fl-callout-text article-blockquote\">\n        <p>The First Amendment protects our right to free speech, but the U.S. Supreme Court has determined this protection doesn\u2019t extend to several categories of unprotected speech, including obscenity. In this article, we review the Court\u2019s decisions that have shaped First Amendment law with respect to obscene material.<\/p>\n\n    <\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The First Amendment to the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Constitution<\/a> reads in part, \u201cCongress shall make no law &#8230; abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1.html\">First Amendment<\/a> rights to <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/free-speech-legal-doctrines.html\">free speech<\/a> and a <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-freedom-of-the-press.html\">free press<\/a> begin as a prohibition on <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/congress.html\" rel=\"noopener\">Congress<\/a> passing laws restricting these freedoms. The Supreme Court has expanded First Amendment rights to encompass all forms of government action at every level through the passage of the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation03.html\">Fourteenth Amendment<\/a> and caselaw.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, First Amendment rights are protected from government restriction. This generally applies to government regulation of private expression. It doesn\u2019t constrain <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/government-speech-and-government-property-under-the-first-amendm.html\">government speech<\/a>. Additionally, speech restrictions imposed by private entities are generally not subject to First Amendment limitations.<\/p>\n<p>The Court has also determined that speech protected by the First Amendment includes performances, the written word, and other forms of expressive conduct. For example, donning an armband to protest a war and refusing to salute the American flag are both forms of speech or <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/free-expression.html\" rel=\"noopener\">expression<\/a> protected by the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, the right to a free press isn\u2019t just a protection for media outlets. Essentially, it safeguards the right of all individuals to share and receive information, news, and ideas. The right to a free press means that, in general, the government cannot stop the press from disseminating information.<\/p>\n<h2>Limits on the First Amendment<\/h2>\n<p>Indeed, First Amendment rights are not without limitations. The Supreme Court has established several circumstances in which government regulation of speech is consistent with the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>It has also developed frameworks and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/legalblogs\/law-and-life\/challenging-laws-3-levels-of-scrutiny-explained\/\" rel=\"noopener\">legal standards<\/a> for determining whether speech restrictions violate the First Amendment. Their application varies depending on the circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>However, they generally weigh the state interest served by the restriction against the First Amendment rights burdened by it. <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/strict-scrutiny.html\" rel=\"noopener\">Strict scrutiny<\/a> is the most difficult standard to satisfy. It requires the restriction to serve a compelling state interest in the least restrictive manner available.<\/p>\n<h2>Unprotected Speech<\/h2>\n<p>The Court has established certain categories of speech that the First Amendment doesn\u2019t protect. This means the government can restrict and penalize unprotected speech without violating the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>Categories of unprotected speech established by the Supreme Court include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/defamation.html\" rel=\"noopener\">Defamation<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/true-threat.html\" rel=\"noopener\">True threats<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-limits--fighting-words--hostile-audiences--and-t.html\">Fighting words<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Obscenity<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-limits--child-pornography.html\">Child pornography<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Below, we discuss Supreme Court decisions dealing with the First Amendment and &#8220;obscenity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Interpretation of Obscenity<\/h2>\n<p>In 1957, the Supreme Court <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/354\/476.html\" rel=\"noopener\">determined<\/a> that obscene material or expression wasn\u2019t protected by the First Amendment. However, it\u2019s struggled to arrive at a definition of obscenity.<\/p>\n<p>The Court has determined that the First Amendment rights to free speech and a free press aren\u2019t necessarily limited to expressing ideas. These rights also extend to entertainment, even sexually explicit entertainment. As the Court explained in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/333\/507.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Winters v. New York<\/i><\/a>, the boundary between informing and entertaining \u201cis too elusive for the protection of that basic right.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/394\/557.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Stanley v. Georgia<\/i><\/a>, the Court also clarified that the right to give and receive \u201cinformation and ideas, regardless of their social worth . . . is fundamental to our free society.\u201d Even sexually explicit material, which is \u201carguably devoid of any ideological content,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/403\/15.html\" rel=\"noopener\">may be protected<\/a> under the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>So then, where is the line between sexually explicit material protected by the First Amendment and unprotected obscene matter? The body of case law establishing guidance for identifying obscenity and evaluating government restrictions on sexually explicit material helps us answer that question.<\/p>\n<h3>Butler v. Michigan<\/h3>\n<p>In 1957, the Supreme Court delivered its first opinion in the field of obscenity. In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/352\/380.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Butler v. Michigan<\/i><\/a>, the Court unanimously invalidated a state statute that criminalized the general distribution of materials inappropriate for minors.<\/p>\n<p>It explained that limiting adult access to only material suitable for minors unconstitutionally burdens adults&#8217; First Amendment rights. Thus, the Court held that restrictions on material that\u2019s inappropriate for children but not obscene for adults will only be upheld if they\u2019re narrowly tailored.<\/p>\n<h3>Roth v. United States<\/h3>\n<p>That same year, the Court first held in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/354\/476.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Roth v. United States<\/i><\/a> that the First Amendment didn\u2019t protect obscenity. It recognized that the First Amendment language doesn\u2019t place conditions on speech and press rights. However, the Court didn\u2019t construe that to mean everything spoken or conveyed is protected.<\/p>\n<p>The <i>Roth<\/i> Court explained that the First Amendment protects expression with even the smallest amount of social importance. Obscenity, however, is completely without social importance.<\/p>\n<p>Historically, all or nearly all the states that ratified the First Amendment had laws on their books criminalizing profanity or blasphemy. Thus, the Court concluded it wasn\u2019t intended to fall within protected speech and the press categories.<\/p>\n<p>The <i>Roth<\/i> Court further clarified that sex and obscenity aren\u2019t the same. For example, depictions of sex within scientific, artistic, and literary material wouldn\u2019t alone prevent First Amendment protection for that material. So, it\u2019s critical that the test for identifying obscenity still protects non-obscene material with sexual content.<\/p>\n<p>The Court explained that obscene material treats sex in a way that appeals to prurient interest. It described prurient interest as \u201ca shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion.\u201d It defined material appealing to it as that which tends \u201cto excite lustful thoughts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Roth Court proceeded to establish a standard for identifying unprotected obscenity:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Whether the average person<\/li>\n<li>Applying contemporary community standards<\/li>\n<li>To the material taken as a whole<\/li>\n<li>Would find its dominant theme appeals to prurient interest<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>After <i>Roth<\/i>, the Court addressed several obscenity cases using this standard.<\/p>\n<h3>Manual Enterprises v. Day<\/h3>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/370\/478.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Manual Enterprises v. Day<\/i><\/a>, the Court reviewed a post office ban on magazines containing homoerotic content. The ban categorized these materials as obscene and thus un-mailable.<\/p>\n<p>The Court couldn\u2019t reach a <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/majority-opinion.html\" rel=\"noopener\">majority opinion<\/a>. However, it struck down the ban, explaining that the material wasn\u2019t obscene and was, therefore, protected by the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>Justices Harlan and Stewart explained in a <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/plurality-opinion.html\" rel=\"noopener\">plurality opinion<\/a> that material is considered obscene if it:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Is patently offensive<\/li>\n<li>Appeals to a prurient interest<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>They reasoned that the nude images of men featured in the magazines couldn\u2019t justly be considered more offensive than the images of nude women tolerated by society.<\/p>\n<h3>Jacobellis v. Ohio<\/h3>\n<p>Likewise, the Court couldn\u2019t reach a majority opinion in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/378\/184.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Jacobellis v. Ohio<\/i><\/a>. Even so, the <i>Jacobellis<\/i> Court reversed a movie theater manager\u2019s conviction for possessing and showing a supposedly obscene film. The film included one sexually explicit scene.<\/p>\n<p>The Court utilized the Roth test, concluding that the film was not legally obscene when considered in its entirety. It also held that obscenity should be based on a national community standard rather than a local one.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Potter Stewart\u2019s concurrence in <i>Jacobellis<\/i> is often quoted for his reference to hard-core pornography: \u201cI know it when I see it.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Ginzburg v. United States<\/h3>\n<p>In 1966, the Court addressed\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/383\/463.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Ginzburg v. United States<\/i><\/a>. Ginzburg was convicted of violating a federal obscenity law when he mailed advertising materials with instructions on how to obtain obscene publications. The Court applied Roth and didn\u2019t find the advertisements themselves to be clearly obscene.<\/p>\n<p>However, it established that in cases dealing with borderline obscene materials, determinations can be based on context provided by the defendant\u2019s conduct, as well as content.<\/p>\n<p>Here, Ginzburg pandered the publications to appeal to prurient interests. As a result, the Court upheld the conviction, finding that the otherwise close materials could have been deemed obscene.<\/p>\n<h3>Memoirs v. Attorney General of Massachusetts<\/h3>\n<p>The Court restated its obscenity test in 1966 in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/383\/413.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Memoirs v. Attorney General of Massachusetts<\/i><\/a><i>, <\/i>adding value as a consideration. For material to be deemed unprotected obscenity, the <i>Memoirs<\/i> Court held, the work as a whole must:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Have a dominant theme that appeals to prurient interest<\/li>\n<li>Be patently offensive because it oversteps current community standards<\/li>\n<li>Be completely devoid of redeeming social value<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Ginsberg v. New York<\/h3>\n<p>In 1968, the Court upheld a law banning the sale of materials with sexual content and nudity to minors in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/390\/629.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Ginsberg v. New York<\/i><\/a>. The Court explained that the state had an interest in protecting the well-being of minors and restricting their access to such materials.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, the Court held that narrowly tailored restrictions on the sale or distribution of material to children are permitted even if the material isn\u2019t obscene for adults.<\/p>\n<h3>Stanley v. Georgia<\/h3>\n<p>The following year, the Court heard <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/394\/557.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Stanley v. Georgia<\/i><\/a>. The <i>Stanley<\/i> decision recognized a limited protected interest in the possession of obscene materials, except child pornography, within the privacy of one\u2019s home.<\/p>\n<p>It explained that a law can\u2019t criminalize mere private possession of obscene material. The First Amendment protects our right to receive ideas and information whether they\u2019re deemed to have social value or not.<\/p>\n<p>It further explained that this right has additional significance in the context of criminalizing the possession of something in the privacy of one\u2019s home. The <i>Stanley<\/i> Court reasoned that protection of one\u2019s mind from the impact of pornography isn\u2019t a legitimate state interest.<\/p>\n<h3>Alexander v. Virginia and Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton<\/h3>\n<p>In 1973, the Court heard the <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/413\/836.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Alexander v. Virginia<\/i><\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/413\/49.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton<\/i><\/a><i> cases<\/i>. In both, the Court addressed whether the First Amendment protects sexually oriented material if there\u2019s reasonable protection preventing exposure to minors and public notice as to the nature of the material.<\/p>\n<p>In <i>Alexander<\/i>, the display of sexually oriented picture magazines was at issue, and the Court sent the matter back to state court. In <i>Paris<\/i>, it was a film.<\/p>\n<p>By a narrow 5-4 majority, the <i>Paris<\/i> Court stuck to the <i>Roth <\/i>standard. It held the film to be obscene. Thus, it wasn\u2019t protected even if it was limited to consenting adults.<\/p>\n<p>Chief Justice Warren Burger penned the opinion and explained that government interests are broader than just protecting minors and unconsenting adults from exposure to pornography. They include enhancing and protecting quality of life, public safety, and the community environment as a whole. To that end, the state may restrict obscene materials in the marketplace.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Douglas dissented. Justice Brennan also penned a dissent, joined by Justices Marshall and Stewart. Brennan\u2019s dissent contended the Court still lacked a proper test for distinguishing obscene material from non-obscene material.<\/p>\n<p>He further explained that he could no longer support the suppression of material deemed to be obscene for consenting adults. He cautioned that government restrictions on obscene material should be limited to protecting unconsenting adults and children from exposure.<\/p>\n<h3>Miller v. California<\/h3>\n<p>That same year, the Court set forth the current standard for unprotected obscenity in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/413\/15.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Miller v. California<\/i><\/a>. In doing so, the Court cautioned that laws restricting pornography are regulating a type of expression.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, restrictions must be narrowly tailored to address only obscene materials. The Court established the Miller test for obscenity. It turns on whether the average person finds that, as a whole, the material:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Appeals to prurient interests according to contemporary adult community standards<\/li>\n<li>Depicts or describes sex or sexual activity in a patently offensive manner according to contemporary adult community standards<\/li>\n<li>Lacks serious artistic, political, literary, or scientific value.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The <i>Miller<\/i> Court specifically rejected the requirement that a work has to be completely devoid of redeeming social value to be regulated.<\/p>\n<p>In its <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/413\/115.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Kaplan v. California<\/i><\/a><i> <\/i>decision that same year, the Court clarified that books with only descriptive content and no visuals can be considered unprotected obscene material.<\/p>\n<p>Three years later, in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/431\/291.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Smith v. United States<\/i><\/a>, the Court held that a jury doesn\u2019t have to apply the community standard definitions set forth by state law. The jury may identify community standards for evaluating obscenity.<\/p>\n<h3>McKinney v. Alabama<\/h3>\n<p>The Court also heard <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/424\/669.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>McKinney v. Alabama<\/i><\/a><i> <\/i>in 1976. The McKinney Court reviewed a state statute alleged to violate a bookseller\u2019s First Amendment rights. The bookseller was charged under the statute for selling obscene materials.<\/p>\n<p>McKinney contended the magazines at issue weren\u2019t obscene. The lower court denied the bookseller\u2019s request to have the jury make that determination. Instead, it held that the determination had already been made in an unrelated prior civil case.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court held that the statute, as applied, violated McKinney\u2019s constitutional rights. The Court also noted that the statute\u2019s procedures for making obscenity determinations didn\u2019t encompass the required sensitivity to free expression.<\/p>\n<h3>American Booksellers Association, Inc. v. Hudnut<\/h3>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/american-booksellers-assn-inc-v-hudnut?sort=relevance&amp;tab=keyword&amp;jxs=&amp;type=case&amp;resultsNav=false\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>American Booksellers Association, Inc. v. Hudnut<\/i><\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-crt-app-sev-ct\" rel=\"noopener\">7<sup>th<\/sup> U.S. Circuit<\/a> Court of Appeals evaluated the constitutionality of an Indianapolis ordinance. The ordinance banned sexual depictions of women in certain roles and positions.<\/p>\n<p>Applying the Miller test, the appellate court determined the law violated the First Amendment. It didn\u2019t satisfy the test criteria.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, the ordinance didn\u2019t require that banned material appeal to the prurient interest in sex or that it be patently offensive to community standards. Likewise, it didn\u2019t require an evaluation of the relevant works\u2019 scientific, artistic, or literary value or an evaluation of the works as a whole.<\/p>\n<p>In its opinion, the court distinguished traditionally obscene material from pornography. The First Amendment does not protect obscene material. The determination of whether pornography is considered obscene depends on the <i>Miller<\/i> test.<\/p>\n<h3>New York v. Ferber<\/h3>\n<p>In the landmark 1982 case of <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/458\/747.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>New York v. Ferber<\/i><\/a>, the Court first held that child pornography isn\u2019t protected by the First Amendment. Regardless of whether or not it\u2019s obscene, it\u2019s unprotected.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the Court reviewed a state law that banned people from knowingly promoting children\u2019s sexual activity and performances by distributing material depicting just that. The Court unanimously held that the law didn\u2019t violate the First Amendment and upheld it.<\/p>\n<p>It also upheld the conviction of bookstore owner Ferber, who sold films of children performing sexual acts to undercover cops.<\/p>\n<h3>Pope v. Illinois<\/h3>\n<p>In 1987, the Court addressed <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/481\/497.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Pope v. Illinois<\/i><\/a>. In Pope, the Court clarified the value prong in the <i>Miller<\/i> test. Specifically, it held that a determination as to whether the material has \u201cserious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value\u201d should be made using the <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/reasonable-person.html\" rel=\"noopener\">reasonable-person<\/a> standard and not community standards.<\/p>\n<h3>Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana<\/h3>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/489\/46.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana<\/i><\/a>, the Court held that the state\u2019s use of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/criminal\/criminal-charges\/racketeering-rico.html\" rel=\"noopener\">RICO laws<\/a> to restrict the distribution of sexually explicit material violated the First Amendment freedoms of speech and the press. It also cautioned that the pre-trial seizure of materials allowed by the RICO laws functioned as an unconstitutional <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/prior-restraint.html\" rel=\"noopener\">prior restraint<\/a> on speech.<\/p>\n<h3>Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.<\/h3>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/501\/560.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.<\/i><\/a>, the Court reviewed a state statute prohibiting public nudity. When the state tried to enforce the statute against two adult entertainment venues, they claimed the law violated their First Amendment rights.<\/p>\n<p>The statute banned public nudity across the board, not just in the context of adult entertainment. Accordingly, the Court determined the law functioned only as an incidental restriction on the venues\u2019 speech.<\/p>\n<p>As such, it needed only to be narrowly tailored to serve a substantial state interest. The Court found it did and upheld the law. But there was no majority opinion.<\/p>\n<p>Justice White penned a dissent joined by Justices Stevens, Marshall, and Blackmun. In it, the Justices contended that the actual purpose of the statutory ban was to curb what the state regarded as harmful messaging conveyed by nude dancing. And they explained that the First Amendment protects against such <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/content-and-viewpoint-based-regulation-of-speech.html\">content-based restrictions<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)<\/h3>\n<p>In the landmark 1997 <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/521\/844.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)<\/i><\/a> matter, the Court struck down provisions of the federal <a href=\"https:\/\/corporate.findlaw.com\/law-library\/the-communications-decency-act-a-primer-for-employers.html\" rel=\"noopener\">Communications Decency Act<\/a> that prohibited transmission of messages containing indecent or obscene content.<\/p>\n<p>It also banned transmissions describing or depicting \u201csexual or excretory activities or organs\u201d in a way that community standards considered offensive. The Court deemed the provisions to be unnecessarily broad content-based restrictions on speech. It based its conclusion on the absence of a statutory definition for \u201cindecent\u201d and no limitation on the Act\u2019s applicability for particular times or people.<\/p>\n<p>We understand the First Amendment doesn\u2019t protect obscene materials. Beyond this, the Supreme Court\u2019s decisions reveal limited clarity with respect to obscenity. The Justices have also had difficulty defining obscenity and agreeing on how much the state can regulate it. The Court decisions\u2019 multiple opinions provide us with some insight into key considerations that will undoubtedly play a role in shaping future high-court holdings.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n                        \n\n<div class=\"generalCardContainer\">\n            \n<div\n    class=\"fl-image-card fl-image-card--no-max-width fl-image-card--no-min-height fl-card-with-children fl-latl-card fl-image-card-title-on-image fl-flex fl-flex-column\"\n>\n                    <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\">\n\n            <div class=\"fl-image-card-image-wrapper fl-image-card-image-wrapper-default\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\n                     src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1750679574\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner.jpg?_i=AA\"\n                     alt=\"\"\n                ><\/img>\n                                    <span class=\"fl-eyebrow fl-image-card-eyebrow\">U.S. Constitution<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/a>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-image-card-content fl-flex-basis-100\">\n                    <h2>More On the Constitution<\/h2>\n<p>Learn about the most important legal document in the United States.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n\n            <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"email-subscription fl-mb30\">\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-header\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-content\">\n            <h3 class=\"fl-callout-sm fl-no-margin\">Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life<\/h3>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-image fl-flex fl-items-end\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\"\n                src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1737476907\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv.png?_i=AA\"\n                alt=\"\"\n                loading=\"lazy\"\n            \/>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-content fl-flex fl-flex-wrap\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-text fl-mb25\">\n            <h4 class=\"fl-no-margin\">Enter your email address to subscribe:<\/h4>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <form class=\"email-subscription-content-form\">\n            <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"distributionList\" value=\"lp\" \/>\n            <label for=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" class=\"fl-text-sm-bold\">Email (Required)<\/label>\n            <div class=\"email-subscription-content-form-group\">\n                <input id=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" name=\"email\" autocomplete=\"email\"\/>\n                <button type=\"submit\" aria-label=\"Submit\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-success subscribe-success-message fl-text-sm-bold\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"status\">Thank you for subscribing!<\/p>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-error subscribe-error-message fl-text-sm-bold\" role=\"alert\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/p>\n\n            <div id=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha\" class=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha subscribe-recaptcha\"\n                data-sitekey=\"0x4AAAAAAABGBEkK9kEeKxO-\"><\/div>\n        <\/form>\n\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-footer fl-text-sm\">\n            <p><a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.findlaw.com\" rel=\"noopener\">Learn more about FindLaw\u2019s newsletters<\/a>, including our terms of use and privacy policy.<\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"general-list\">\n    <h3>You May Also Like<\/h3>\n    <ul class=\"fl-list fl-no-margin\">\n                                    <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-limits--fighting-words--hostile-audiences--and-t.html\">\n                        Does the First Amendment Protect Threats and Hate Speech?\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/content-and-viewpoint-based-regulation-of-speech.html\">\n                        Content-Based and Viewpoint-Based Regulations of Speech\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/defamation-and-false-statements-under-the-first-amendment.html\">\n                        Defamation and the First Amendment\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                        <\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <div class=\"popularDirectory\">\n        <div class=\"general-popular-directory \">\n            <div class=\"general-popular-directory-title\">\n                <h3>Popular Directory Searches<\/h3>\n            <\/div>\n            <ul>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/constitutional-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitutional Law<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/civil-rights\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Rights<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/discrimination\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Discrimination<\/a><\/li>\n                            <\/ul>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"parent":30862,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-30884","constitution","type-constitution","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/constitution"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}