{"id":30880,"date":"2021-07-02T12:25:09","date_gmt":"2021-07-02T17:25:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/constitution\/amendment1\/first-amendment-freedom-of-association.html"},"modified":"2024-08-07T15:01:04","modified_gmt":"2024-08-07T20:01:04","slug":"first-amendment-freedom-of-association","status":"publish","type":"constitution","link":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-freedom-of-association.html","title":{"rendered":"Freedom of Association"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        <h1 class=\"fl-no-margin-top\">Freedom of Association<\/h1>\n<section class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline\">\n    <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-content\">\n                    By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/samuel-strom-j-d\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Samuel Strom, J.D.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/laura-temme-esq\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Laura Temme, Esq.<\/a>\n                | Last reviewed\n        <time>\n                            August 07, 2024\n                    <\/time>\n    <\/div>\n\n    \n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-legally-reviewed\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Legally Reviewed\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team.html\" rel=\"noopener\">FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/company-history\/editorial-policy.html\" rel=\"noopener\">our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n\n    <details class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle fl-gutenberg-byline-fast-checked\">\n        <summary>\n            <i class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-icon\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n            Fact-Checked\n        <\/summary>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-gutenberg-byline-toggle-content\">\n            <p><em>The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/company\/our-team\/contributing-authors.html\" rel=\"noopener\">contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please <a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/?fli=bylinelink\" rel=\"noopener\">contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/details>\n<\/section>\n    <div class=\"fl-callout-text article-blockquote\">\n        <p>Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention a right to associate, the Supreme Court has implied the right to exist because it gives effect to the other First Amendment freedoms. It provides a right to associate or affiliate with a group and exercise your First Amendment rights.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n    <\/div>\n\n<p>The Supreme Court has long held that the First Amendment&#8217;s protection of free speech includes a &quot;freedom of association.&quot; Generally, this means you can associate with others with similar beliefs.<\/p>\r\n<p>This article discusses several topics related to the First Amendment&#8217;s associational rights, including:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>The First Amendment&#8217;s text and an explanation of the freedom of association<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>How the Supreme Court&#8217;s interpretation of the First Amendment led to the right\u2019s development<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Limitations on the right to association<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Landmark Supreme Court cases involving the freedom of association<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><b>What the First Amendment Says<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1.html\">First Amendment<\/a> to the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">U.S. Constitution<\/a> states the following:<\/p>\r\n<p>&quot;<i>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.<\/i>&quot;<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>What Is the Right to Freedom of Association?<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The First Amendment right to association generally refers to the ability to associate with (or exclude) other individuals when engaging in free speech activities. Essentially, it protects the right to associate with others who have similar beliefs. For example, political parties and religious groups receive First Amendment protection via freedom of association.<\/p>\r\n<p>Legal scholars note that there are two different strands of protected associations:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>Expressive association<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Intimate association<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>&quot;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.gmu.edu\/pubs\/papers\/05_17\" rel=\"noopener\">Expressive association<\/a>&quot; refers to the people&#8217;s right to associate and exercise First Amendment freedoms. Groups that engage in free speech or the exercise of religion fall under this category. The government generally cannot interfere with these groups&#8217; freedom of expression. Several Supreme Court cases address expressive association, including:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/468\/609.html#\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Roberts v. United States Jaycees<\/i><\/a> (1984)<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/530\/640.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Boy Scouts of America v. Dale<\/i><\/a> (2000)<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Legal scholars note that expressive association is rooted in the First Amendment. As the Court noted in <i>Roberts<\/i>, &quot;The Constitution guarantees freedom of association of this kind as an indispensable means of preserving other individual liberties.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>&quot;Intimate association&quot; is rooted in the<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14.html\"> Fourteenth Amendment<\/a>. An intimate association refers to a group comprised of &quot;highly personal relationships.&quot; Generally, this means the group is full of known associates instead of strangers.<\/p>\r\n<p>As the Court noted in <i>Roberts<\/i>, the choice to associate and &quot;maintain certain intimate human relationships&quot; is &quot;a fundamental element of personal liberty.&quot; These associations play a &quot;central role&quot; in the constitutional scheme and in &quot;safeguarding individual freedom.&quot; Therefore, they receive protection against &quot;undue intrusion&quot; by the government.<\/p>\r\n<p>The right to associate is more than just a right to attend a meeting. Instead, it is &quot;the right to express one&#8217;s attitudes or philosophies by membership in a group or by affiliation with it or by other lawful means.&quot; (<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/381\/479.html#\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Griswold v. Connecticut<\/i><\/a> (1965)). The Supreme Court has stated that association in this context is a &quot;form of expression of opinion.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>The freedom of association also prohibits laws that require groups to include people they disagree with regarding certain political, religious, or other ideological subjects. The Court has held that compelling groups to include people can violate group members&#8217; freedom of association. (<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/515\/557.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston<\/i><\/a> (1995)).<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>Free Speech and Freedom of Association<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>The states ratified the First Amendment and nine others with the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/bill-of-rights.html\">Bill of Rights<\/a> in 1791. It enumerates the following fundamental rights:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/freedom-of-religion.html\">Freedom of religion<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/freedom-of-speech.html\">Freedom of speech<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-freedom-of-the-press.html\">Freedom of the press<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/first-amendment-freedom-of-assembly-and-petition.html\">Freedom of assembly<\/a><\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The First Amendment&#8217;s text does not explicitly provide for the freedom of association. However, the Supreme Court has found that the freedom to associate is &quot;<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/468\/609.html\" rel=\"noopener\">an indispensable means of preserving<\/a>&quot; other First Amendment freedoms.<\/p>\r\n<p>The First Amendment freedoms imply a freedom of association. As Judge Frank Easterbrook noted during a panel at the Federalist Society&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/fedsoc.org\/conferences\/1986-national-student-symposium\" rel=\"noopener\">1986 National Student Symposium<\/a>, the First Amendment contains three express rights to group speech.<\/p>\r\n<p>Freedom of the press describes &quot;the exercise of the right of speech by organized groups.&quot; Freedom of religion addresses &quot;another organized set of group speech.&quot; Freedom of assembly, he said, is &quot;the organized exercise of the right to petition for the redress of grievances.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Given these express rights, Judge Easterbrook said there is a &quot;logical right&quot; to associate. The right to associate, he argues, gives effect to the right to free speech.<\/p>\r\n<p>Similarly, the Supreme Court wrote in <a href=\"https:\/\/tile.loc.gov\/storage-services\/service\/ll\/usrep\/usrep357\/usrep357449\/usrep357449.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson<\/i><\/a> (1958):<\/p>\r\n<p>&quot;It is beyond debate that freedom to engage in association for advancements of beliefs and ideas is an inseparable aspect of the &#8216;liberty&#8217; assured by the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment14\/annotation03.html\">Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/a>, which embraces freedom of speech.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>In <i>Griswold<\/i>, the Court wrote that although the First Amendment does not expressly state a right to associate, &quot;its existence is necessary in making the express guarantees fully meaningful.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>In the <i>NAACP<\/i> case, Alabama tried to prevent the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) from operating in the state. A circuit court issued a restraining order against the state. In response, Alabama issued a <a href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.findlaw.com\/definition\/subpoena.html\" rel=\"noopener\">subpoena<\/a> for the NAACP&#8217;s records, including membership lists.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court held that the state of Alabama could not obtain the NAACP&#8217;s membership lists. It concluded that the state&#8217;s interest in obtaining the records did not justify the potential deterring effect such disclosures could have on NAACP members&#8217; right of association. Specifically, exposing the NAACP&#8217;s members&#8217; identities could subject them to harassment or worse.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court determined that the member&#8217;s rights trumped the state&#8217;s interest in obtaining the records. Therefore, the Court ruled Alabama could not obtain them. The Court recognized that compelling someone to disclose their group affiliation could inhibit their First Amendment rights. The court&#8217;s decision solidified the idea underlying the freedom of association by protecting the &quot;freedom to associate and privacy in one&#8217;s associations.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>Limits on the Freedom of Association<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>Like the freedom of speech, the freedom of association is not an absolute right. It has several limitations, and the government may infringe on your right of association in certain circumstances. For instance, the government may prevent people from entering into illegal private agreements. For example, groups cannot intend to deprive others of their civil liberties or legal rights. This is true even if the agreement possesses an element of association. (<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/456\/45.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Brown v. Hartlage<\/i><\/a> (1982)).<\/p>\r\n<p>Further, the First Amendment does not protect every type of association. As noted above, it generally only protects expressive and intimate associations. Other types of associations do not fall within the First Amendment&#8217;s protection.<\/p>\r\n<p>For example, in <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/490\/19.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Dallas v. Stanglin<\/i><\/a> (1989), the Court held that states could license dance halls that only allowed teenagers to attend. In doing so, the Court stated that excluding adults from the dance halls did not violate &quot;the teenagers&#8217; right to associate with people outside of their age group.&quot; The Court&#8217;s holding declared that &quot;there is no generalized right of &#8216;social association&#8217; that includes chance encounters in dance halls.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Courts will balance the interests involved when a law purports to limit a group. The law is valid if the government&#8217;s interests outweigh the burden it may place on members&#8217; rights. If the group members&#8217; rights outweigh the government&#8217;s interest, a court will likely find that the law is invalid.<\/p>\r\n<p>A valid infringement of the right of association requires the following:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>The infringement must be viewpoint-neutral<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>The government must justify the infringement by showing a compelling interest<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>The government must narrowly tailor the infringement<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>However, the government does not have to listen to a group or association&#8217;s concerns. Of course, people have the right to associate and express their opinions. But, the government does not have an obligation to listen to their opinions. <\/p>\r\n<p>The following section describes some of these exceptions in more detail.<\/p>\r\n<h2><b>Supreme Court Decisions Regarding the Freedom of Association<\/b><\/h2>\r\n<p>This section provides summaries of U.S. Supreme Court cases involving the freedom of association.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte (1984)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In 1984, the Court decided two significant cases regarding freedom of association. Both cases required the Court to balance laws prohibiting discrimination against constitutional protections.<\/p>\r\n<p>The first,<a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/481\/537.html\" rel=\"noopener\"> <i>Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte<\/i><\/a>, involved a California Rotary Club that violated its bylaws by allowing women to become active members.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Duarte Rotary Club allowed three women to join the club, which violated its policy. Rotary International revoked its charter and expelled the club. The California Court of Appeals ruled that Rotary International&#8217;s policy violated a California civil rights law prohibiting sexual discrimination.<\/p>\r\n<p>Rotary International appealed to the Supreme Court. It argued that the civil rights law violated its right to association.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Supreme Court concluded that the Rotary Club was neither an intimate nor expressive association. Therefore, the association did not receive First Amendment protection. The Court unanimously ruled that admitting women into the club would not prevent it from carrying out its stated purposes. Additionally, the Court held that even if admitting women as members of the club would affect some members&#8217; right to associate, the state&#8217;s interest in ending sexual discrimination justified the minimal infringement.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>Less than a month after deciding <i>Rotary Club<\/i>, the Court reviewed a similar challenge. This time, it involved a Minnesota civil rights law.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/468\/609.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Roberts<\/i><\/a> involved the Minnesota chapter of the United States Jaycees. Its bylaws limited membership to men between the ages of 18 and 35.<\/p>\r\n<p>Two Minnesota chapters of the Jaycees began admitting women members in the mid-1970s. The national organization sanctioned the Minnesota chapters. In 1978, it informed the chapters that it was planning to revoke their charters.<\/p>\r\n<p>Members of both chapters filed complaints with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. They argued that the bylaws violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act (the &quot;Act&quot;). The Act prohibited groups from denying access to public accommodations based on gender.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Jaycees filed a lawsuit against state officials. They sought to prevent the officials from enforcing the Act. Specifically, the group argued that forcing them to admit women would violate the male members&#8217; rights to association and free speech.<\/p>\r\n<p>The case eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court issued the following rulings:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><p>The Act did not infringe on male members&#8217; rights to freedom of association.<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>The Jaycees did not have the type of highly personal relationships required to afford it protection against governmental interference. For example, the organization was large and did not employ criteria for judging whether someone could become a member. In addition, members (and non-members) of both genders participated in many activities central to the association&#8217;s formation and maintenance.<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<li><p>Minnesota had a compelling state interest in eliminating discrimination against women. The state&#8217;s interest was separate and unrelated to the suppression of expression. The state&#8217;s interest also outweighed any impact the Act may have on male members&#8217; freedom of association. The Act furthered the state&#8217;s interest through the least restrictive means available.<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>The Court noted there was no evidence that admitting women into the Jaycees would impede the male members&#8217; ability to continue their constitutionally protected activities. Specifically, there was no evidence that doing so would negatively affect the Jaycees&#8217; ability to fundraise or promote its civic goals. And even if it did, the effect would not outweigh the state&#8217;s goal of eliminating discrimination.<\/p>\r\n<p>The majority opinion also discussed the underlying purpose of freedom of association. It noted that implicit in the right to engage in First Amendment freedoms is &quot;a corresponding right to associate with others in pursuit of a wide variety of political, social, economic, educational, religious, and cultural ends.&quot; The Court noted that the right is &quot;especially important in preserving political and cultural diversity and in shielding dissident expression from suppression by the majority.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Both <i>Rotary Club<\/i> and <i>Roberts<\/i> shed light on the Court&#8217;s method of balancing the right to associate and states&#8217; interests in eliminating discrimination. If a state law potentially infringes on a group&#8217;s members&#8217; right to associate, courts will analyze whether the law advances a legitimate state interest. If it does, it will analyze whether the law does so in the least restrictive means available. It will also determine whether the law is related to the suppression of ideas.<\/p>\r\n<p>In short, courts can override the freedom of association with laws the government adopts to serve a compelling state interest. The laws cannot relate to the suppression of ideas. Additionally, the state must show it cannot achieve its goal through less restrictive means.<\/p>\r\n<p>If the law does not meet these conditions, courts will likely rule in favor of the group&#8217;s members. See the discussions of <i>Hurley <\/i>and <i>Dale<\/i> below for examples of the Court refusing to apply anti-discrimination laws.<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In<i> <\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/515\/557.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Hurley<\/i><\/a>, the Court had to decide whether a court order requiring a veteran&#8217;s group to include an organization comprised of homosexual people to walk in a parade violated the veterans&#8217; freedom of association.<\/p>\r\n<p>The city of Boston authorized the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council to organize the city&#8217;s St. Patrick&#8217;s Day parade in 1993. The Council refused to allow an organization, GLIB, to walk in the parade.<\/p>\r\n<p>Individuals of Irish descent formed GLIB. Their goal was to &quot;express pride in their Irish heritage as openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>After the denial, GLIB filed a lawsuit against the Council. It claimed that the Council violated a Massachusetts law that prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation.<\/p>\r\n<p>The trial court ruled that the Council had to allow GLIB to participate in the parade. The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed the trial court&#8217;s decision. The Council appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.<\/p>\r\n<p>The issue for the Court was whether the judicial order to admit GLIB into the parade violated the Council&#8217;s First Amendment rights. More broadly, the issue was whether the First Amendment required a parade organizer to &quot;admit a parade contingent expressing a message not of the private organizers&#8217; own choosing.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Justice David Souter wrote the Court&#8217;s unanimous opinion. He first noted that parades are a form of speech. Participants in a parade make a &quot;collective point&quot; to each other and bystanders (citing <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/394\/111.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Gregory v. Chicago<\/i><\/a> (1969)). It also held that a parade organizer&#8217;s selection of parade participants is entitled to First Amendment protection.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court noted that an important principle of free speech is that &quot;one who chooses to speak may also decide &#8216;what not to say.&#8217;&quot; Because the lower court&#8217;s order required the Council to admit GLIB into the parade, it had &quot;the effect of declaring the sponsors&#8217; speech itself to be the public accommodation.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court noted that this opened the door to allow &quot;any contingent of protected individuals with a message&quot; to participate in the Council&#8217;s speech. This would result in the Council&#8217;s speech being shaped by any protected group that wished to join the parade. The Court ruled that the state could not use its power in such a way. Doing so, the Court wrote, would violate &quot;the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment, that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>According to the Court, the Council&#8217;s reasoning for excluding GLIB did not matter. Justice Souter wrote that the Council&#8217;s decision to exclude GLIB from the parade was enough to &quot;invoke its right as a private speaker to shape its expression by speaking on one subject while remaining silent on another.&quot; He added that &quot;it boils down to the choice of a speaker not to propound a particular point of view, and that choice is presumed to lie beyond the government&#8217;s power to control.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<h3><b>Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/530\/640.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Dale<\/i><\/a>, the Court refused to apply an anti-discrimination law that prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation. Like<i> Hurley<\/i>, the case stands for the idea that compelled association can violate the First Amendment.<\/p>\r\n<p>The case involved an assistant Boy Scout scoutmaster, James Dale. His Boy Scout troop learned he was &quot;an avowed homosexual and gay rights activist.&quot; The troop subsequently revoked his position. Afterward, Dale requested a reason for his dismissal. The Council Executive notified him that the troop &quot;specifically forbid membership to homosexuals.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>Dale filed a lawsuit in New Jersey state court. He alleged the Boy Scouts violated a New Jersey state law that prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation.<\/p>\r\n<p>The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that the law required the Boy Scouts to admit Dale as a scoutmaster. The Boy Scouts appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. It argued that &quot;homosexual conduct&quot; was &quot;inconsistent with the values&quot; it sought to instill in its members.<\/p>\r\n<p>The issue for the Court was whether applying New Jersey&#8217;s anti-discrimination law &quot;violated the Boy Scouts&#8217; right of expressive association.&quot; The Court ruled that it did. Specifically, the Court held that a state law requiring the Boy Scouts to retain Dale would &quot;burden&quot; its right to oppose or disfavor homosexual conduct.<\/p>\r\n<p>The Court also held that New Jersey&#8217;s interest in preventing discrimination did not justify the &quot;severe intrusion&quot; on the Boy Scouts&#8217; freedom of expressive association. The Court noted that it did not necessarily agree or disagree with the Boy Scouts&#8217; stance on homosexual conduct. However, regardless of the Court&#8217;s stance with respect to homosexual conduct, it ruled that it did not justify a state law that would compel an organization to accept members &quot;in derogation of the organization&#8217;s expressive message.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>In other words, the state could not interfere with a group&#8217;s speech &quot;for no better reason than promoting an approved message or discouraging a disfavored one, however enlightened either purpose may seem.&quot; Citing an earlier case, <a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/court\/us-supreme-court\/487\/1.html\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>New York State Club Ass&#8217;n v. New York City<\/i><\/a> (1988) and <i>Roberts<\/i>, the Court wrote that &quot;forcing a group to accept certain members may impair the ability of the group to express those views, and only those views, that it intends to express. Thus, &#8216;[f]reedom of association &#8230; plainly presupposes a freedom not to associate.&#8217;&quot;<\/p>\r\n<p>As the <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.congress.gov\/browse\/essay\/amdt1-8-1\/ALDE_00013139\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution Annotated notes<\/a>, <i>Hurley<\/i> and <i>Dale<\/i> reinforce that &quot;in some circumstances, laws requiring organizations to include persons with whom they disagree on political, religious, or ideological matters can violate members&#8217; freedom of association.&quot; This is especially true if the laws &quot;interfere with an organization&#8217;s message.&quot;<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n                        \n\n<div class=\"generalCardContainer\">\n            \n<div\n    class=\"fl-image-card fl-image-card--no-max-width fl-image-card--no-min-height fl-card-with-children fl-latl-card fl-image-card-title-on-image fl-flex fl-flex-column\"\n>\n                    <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\">\n\n            <div class=\"fl-image-card-image-wrapper fl-image-card-image-wrapper-default\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"\n                     src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1750679574\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner\/general-components-hero-lp-constitution-hero-banner.jpg?_i=AA\"\n                     alt=\"\"\n                ><\/img>\n                                    <span class=\"fl-eyebrow fl-image-card-eyebrow\">U.S. Constitution<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/a>\n\n        <div class=\"fl-image-card-content fl-flex-basis-100\">\n                    <h2>More On the Constitution<\/h2>\n<p>Learn about the most important legal document in the United States.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/\">Read more &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n\n            <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n<div class=\"email-subscription fl-mb30\">\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-header\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-content\">\n            <h3 class=\"fl-callout-sm fl-no-margin\">Stay Up-to-Date With How the Law Affects Your Life<\/h3>\n        <\/div>\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-header-image fl-flex fl-items-end\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\"\n                src=\"https://constitution.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/images\/w_1200,c_limit,dpr_auto\/f_auto,q_auto:eco\/v1737476907\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv\/Image-subscribeModule_zjhmpv.png?_i=AA\"\n                alt=\"\"\n                loading=\"lazy\"\n            \/>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"email-subscription-content fl-flex fl-flex-wrap\">\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-text fl-mb25\">\n            <h4 class=\"fl-no-margin\">Enter your email address to subscribe:<\/h4>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <form class=\"email-subscription-content-form\">\n            <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"distributionList\" value=\"lp\" \/>\n            <label for=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" class=\"fl-text-sm-bold\">Email (Required)<\/label>\n            <div class=\"email-subscription-content-form-group\">\n                <input id=\"email-subscription-content-form-group-input\" name=\"email\" autocomplete=\"email\"\/>\n                <button type=\"submit\" aria-label=\"Submit\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-success subscribe-success-message fl-text-sm-bold\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"status\">Thank you for subscribing!<\/p>\n            <p class=\"email-subscription-content-form-error subscribe-error-message fl-text-sm-bold\" role=\"alert\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/p>\n\n            <div id=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha\" class=\"email-subscription-content-form-recaptcha subscribe-recaptcha\"\n                data-sitekey=\"0x4AAAAAAABGBEkK9kEeKxO-\"><\/div>\n        <\/form>\n\n        <div class=\"email-subscription-content-footer fl-text-sm\">\n            <p><a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.findlaw.com\" rel=\"noopener\">Learn more about FindLaw\u2019s newsletters<\/a>, including our terms of use and privacy policy.<\/p>\n\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"general-list\">\n    <h3>You May Also Like<\/h3>\n    <ul class=\"fl-list fl-no-margin\">\n                                    <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/bill-of-rights.html\">\n                        The Bill of Rights\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/freedom-of-speech.html\">\n                        Freedom of Speech\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                                                <li class=\"fl-list-item fl-flex\">\n                    <i class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>\n                    <a class=\"fl-list-item-link\" href=\"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/amendment1\/freedom-of-religion.html\">\n                        Freedom of Religion\n                    <\/a>\n                <\/li>\n                        <\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n    <div class=\"popularDirectory\">\n        <div class=\"general-popular-directory \">\n            <div class=\"general-popular-directory-title\">\n                <h3>Popular Directory Searches<\/h3>\n            <\/div>\n            <ul>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/constitutional-law\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitutional Law<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/civil-rights\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Rights<\/a><\/li>\n                                    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/discrimination\/?fli=dcta\" rel=\"noopener\">Discrimination<\/a><\/li>\n                            <\/ul>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":30862,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-30880","constitution","type-constitution","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/constitution"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/constitution\/30862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constitution.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}